Unpaid Product Review: Gab.ai

Maybe you’ve heard a thing or two about Twitter censoring people, often selectively based on political preferences or personal relationships. Or perhaps that the company manipulates it’s “Trending” feature to control what gets listed at the top, despite how many people are actually tweeting about it.

Twitter is well within its rights to do this. And maybe you’re okay with it! But Andrew Torba wasn’t.

Torba, a Bay Area tech entrepreneur recently launched Gab.ai, as a competing platform to Twitter. And unlike Twitter, Torba vows that he will let users dictate what they see or don’t. It is based on what Torba calls a #SpeakFreely mindset.

This is because Torba believes that the only valid form of censorship is self-censorship: Don’t like it? Don’t read it. 

Called #SeeNoEvil, the feature lets users decide what they want to filter out of their Gab experience.

And guess what? I’ve been lucky enough to get onto the beta version of Gab. So here are my first impressions. 

First, the functionality is familiar if you’re used to Twitter: Users’ handles are preceded by @, there are hashtags, notifications, reposting (think retweeting), trending topics, emojis, etc. The learning curve is very small, mainly consisting of getting used to the user interface.

There are refinements to this, such as being able to sort your notifications by type, but I haven’t had a need for this yet.

The user base is obviously smaller, and is pretty one-sided so far, consisting of a lot of people dissatisfied with Twitter, or who have had their accounts suspended or locked for certain things they’ve said. So it’s a bit of an echo chamber, but that should change once the platform opens up to everybody.

Interestingly, you can upvote or downvote posts, expressing your approval or disapproval, as opposed to only “liking” things. It all goes towards that free speech thing, I suppose.

Some functions are lacking. You cannot insert images directly into posts, but must paste the link for the photo to appear. Also, there’s no mobile app, though one is forthcoming. Luckily, the mobile in-browser display is mostly fine.

But, and here’s a huge one: Gab has a 300 character limit over Twitter’s 140. So far, I feel that this is a good upgrade without being too big of a number. It makes having slightly more nuanced conversations far easier.

I do think that Gab needs to replicate the full functionality of Twitter as quickly as possible in order to entice Twitter users to hop on board. I’m sure this is something they’re working on, but Twitter has created a good user experience that many will find hard to give up or split time between, especially power users who use Twitter to drive their businesses.

Lastly, if there isn’t one already, I think an edit feature could definitely create a buzz and convert Tweeters to Gab.

So there you have it. I’m a fan so far, and predict big things for Gab as the product gets refined and the user base grows. More characters and no top-down censorship coupled with an excited, active crew of early adopters. I’m optimistic about Gab, I recommend requesting an invite on Gab.ai so you can start gabbing along with the rest of us loudmouths.

UPDATE: As of September 12, Gab now has an edit function.

Note: I am getting paid nothing by Mr. Torba, any other of the fine folks at Gab, or anybody whatsoever for writing this review, nor have I been asked by anybody to write it. This is purely of my own accord and based on my own experience and opinion of the product; hence the “unpaid.”

Follow me on Twitter @DaytimeRenegade and Gab.ai at @DaytimeRenegade 

And check out my Instagram here

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Unpaid Product Review: Gab.ai

    1. The Daytime Renegade says:

      Thanks for the comment!

      I think Gab is great and can see the potential to get better, AND steal Twitter users. I think an edit function and a killer mobile app would go a long way towards that.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. you forgot to mention the fact that he doxed a person that said things bad about gab.ai and that he used to sell users informations in a project that he made a time ago. And again it’s a private entity controlling it just like Twitter, it’s never 100% trustable. It’s Better to use federated social networks. Example: https://wrongthink.net/ | http://sealion.club/ | https://shitposter.club/ and much more, basically anyone can make a server but again these are non-profit websites they pay with their pockets and ask for donations. These are the ones that are really trying to give out to freedom of Speech for people. Why is it better to use a federated? Because since there are multiple websites it’s impossible to censor anyone and that also makes bans limited to the website and not to the whole network.

    Like

  2. JOHN says:

    The initiative is great . Especially since the global “social manipulation & propaganda” networks like google, fakebook, twitter, are involved in distorting the truth, censoring free speech and harassing dissenters.

    wikipedia article about GAB.ai is just another propaganda piece written by far left activists who are (it seems) in control of the so called “free encyclopaedia”. The article is obviously made to discourage users to switch from twitter by slandering GAB.ai insinuating that it is the social media of the “alt-right” or that only Trump supporters use it.

    I encourage users to counter this narrative on wikipedia.

    HOWEVER:

    I have tested GAB and I experienced the following:

    – It doesn’t work properly with Firefox . Really weird…
    – When you Register, you are on a waiting list with a ref. number, they say they will contact you per email. Weird- They finally send you an activation link few days after again.
    – When I got in the first time, I found it was quite limited compared to its competitors. Also I realised it wasn’t working fully with Firefox.

    So, I used the email address provided by GAB (a nominative email address) when I registered and wrote to the person. SURPRISE! The email doesn’t exists….!!!!!

    That’s y experience with GAB. So the establishment won’t need to slander, lie and use wikipedia to denigrate GAB, the tool does it for itself.

    Looked like a scam to me….

    BUT IT DOESN’T AVOID PEOPLE TO QUICKLY CLOSE THEIR ACCOUNTS ON STASIBOOK, GOGLEBOLSHEVIK AND TWTTERHATE AND MOVE TO OTHER, FREER MEDIA.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s