Pulp Rock

Pictured: No rock.

I care about rock n’ roll, perhaps too much. Like Pete Townshend said, “Rock is very, very important and very, very ridiculous.”

Look at the charts now, read a magazine, or flip through the radio, and you’ll see that rock is done as a cultural force. Totally dead. 

Sure, there’s Rolling Stone, but what young people really care about that?

Guitar-based groups are niche old-people music at best, and I lump myself into this group. Rock is just kinda-sorta still here because of nostalgia. Rock is an Anglo-American thing, so we’ll keep it around for tradition’s sake. 

No one cares about it. It doesn’t capture the imagination anymore. Kids aren’t growing up dreaming of playing guitar. They want to rap or dance or sing pop stuff. And that’s fine. Everything changes. But it still makes me sad. 

Of course rock is still there. And of course there is still “good”‘stuff. The barriers to entry are low and, thanks to the Internet, you can find whatever kind of music it is that you’re into. So it’s there, but it doesn’t matter. 

Aside from the legacy “bigs,” who cares?

Why? How’d it get to this point?

I contend that it died from self-inflicted wounds. Like many forms of entertainment, a stultifying combination of political correctness, commoditization, and technological disruption ruined it. The freewheeling, anything goes 60s and 70s gave way to the slick 80s, the faux-rebellious 90s–reeked of manufactured authenticity–to the pretension-soaked indie 2000s and now the the whatever-you-call-them 2010s (the dead zone?).

Every big movement came from the ground-up: Acid rock. Punk. Prog. Hardcore. Grunge (at least, the Melvins). Hell, even the much-derided emo thing. 

But one thing rock couldn’t do was escape its own ass. 

The more mainstream it got, the more it got bland. With big money came the need to use it for something other than drugs and buy houses. Enter being “socially conscious.”

That is, pedantic. 

That is, annoying. 

That is, boring. A word that should never be associated with rock n’ roll. 

Perhaps no decade exemplifies this more than the 90s. This 1991 awards show, featuring one of the two high-priests of rock pretension, R.E.M. frontman Michael Stipe (the other being Pearl Jam singer Eddie Vedder) says it all:

Smarmy. Self-righteous. Lame.

Yes indeed, rock suffered from the same virus that’s choking sci-fi/fantasy, comic books, movies, and now video games: Cultural conformity, typically in the leftward direction. 

I don’t need my music to be one way politically or the other. I’d just like it to not all be the same. 

Read Pitchfork, for example. Music is judged on its socio-political impact as much, if not more, than the notes involved. 

Radiohead has been ass for over a decade, but they’re still “vital” and “important.”

To whom? 

Rock music needs something like the Pulp Revolution that’s going on in sci-fi and fantasy. 

No, not the band Pulp, though I wouldn’t mind seeing them come back as well. Now there was a band that thought for itself. Sneakily subversive. Just listen to “Common People” for a taste of what I mean:

Anyway, I think rock needs to go back to the anything-goes attitude that made it fun and rebellious and exciting in the first place. Skewer sacred cows. Shatter musical constraints. And crank up the fun over the “importance.”

You’re running around playing power chords and acting like you’re the next Beethoven or whatever while spouting PC-approved taking points. Get a grip. 

What about fun? What about the things that made us human? What about poking holes in the establishment, instead of being establishment? 

What about optimism? 

What about weighty topics discussed intelligently?

And what about getting rid of the rules?

Maybe then it’ll have more of a cultural impact again. 

Follow me on Twitter @DaytimeRenegade and Gab.ai @DaytimeRenegade

And check out my Instagram here

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Pulp Rock

  1. deuce says:

    Great post!

    A big part of bringing back rock would be tearing down the self-imposed barriers that say only certain ethnic groups can get away with talking — in non-PC ways interesting to teenage boys — about sex, violence and other “fun stuff”. There’s a reason why “You Shook Me All Night Long” and “Highway to Hell” are still considered classics across an incredibly wide spectrum of demographics. Rock n’ roll has suffered a huge loss of confidence. It was NOT founded on serious social commentary FIRST with everything else subsidiary. Men, especially teenage men, are sexual animals. They’ll gravitate to genres of music that speak to that.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The Daytime Renegade says:

      Thanks for the comment Deuce.

      You absolutely picked up on my point. Rock has no swagger. What, in it, would capture a young boy to want to play guitar the way Led Zeppelin, say, or Van Halen did to countless others throughout the years? What in rock now makes women want the performer and men want to be the performer? It sounds silly, but that was a large part of rock n’ roll’s appeal back to the Chuck Berry and Elvis Presley days, to the Beatles, Stones, and Hendrix, to Zeppelin and then even the much-maligned hair metal acts of the 80s.

      And then it died in the 90s in a puff of noxious self-importance and now it’s just wimpy.

      Whenever there’s a revival, it’s got “too much testosterone” or is “regressive.” Why? Because they’re having fun and *gasp* singing about things they like, including and women?

      Pass.

      Like

  2. Despite what some want to believe, music is about EMOTION, not politics. Human emotions don’t change in the sense of “those teenage boys need to be reeducated into not wanting the things they want”. If some rocker isn’t allowed to sing about looking enthusiastically for tail, then teenage boys will find somebody like Li’l Wayne/whatever who WILL. Ever notice that Rolling Stone popularized the term “butt rock”? Why is there no equivalent slur for rap? I really liked a lot of grunge at the time, but the endgame of it was pretty nihilistic. I sometimes wonder what would’ve happened if…

    A: Axl had been able to just get along and keep the original G n’ R going

    And B: Andrew Wood had been able to truly kick heroin and Eddie Vedder had never found a job.

    There is no need to be ashamed of being horny and wanting to play loud guitar.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The Daytime Renegade says:

      Well said. I think why Pink Floyd worked, for example, is that they discussed weighty, intelligent topics (IMO) but wedded them to incredibly emotional music and wrapped them in relatable lyrics that discussed the specific in a universal, easily relatable way. It’s very difficult to do, but they did it.

      Roger Waters might be a left-wing crank, but the man is a hell of a lyricist.

      And Rolling Stone and “butt rock”…David Lee Roth had a great quote, something like “Critics hate me and love Elvis Costello because they look like Elvis Costello.”

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s