Skepticism comes in a variety of styles and flavors. Some prefer the nihilistic variety, others prefer playing skeptical troll.
But fortunately for us, there’s a better kind of skepticism.
One that we can use to:
1. Uplift others
2. Make conversation
3. Become more intelligent in the process.
This variety of skepticism will be known as “methodological skepticism” (a distinction borrowed from scholar Michael Forster).
This skepticism relies on a Greek concept called “equipollence” meaning “equal force on both sides” as it pertains to making arguments.
And we can use this form of skepticism in a very “judicial” manner–meaning we can use to build up the arguments of our “opponents,” test our arguments against this “iron man”–for strawmen are intentionally weak arguments designed to set us up for moral grandstanding–and see which argument wins. Continue reading “Guest Post: Methodological Skepticism by Zigmund Reichenbach of All My Small Thoughts”